National Geographic
- Platform
- Niche
- beauty· medium confidence
- Followers
- 269M
- Posts analyzed
- 50
Compared against 0 mega beauty. Score weights the four pillars below.
- Engagementweight 35%23
Engagement sits below peers; reach is decent but interaction is thin.
- Consistencyweight 25%29
Cadence is uneven; gaps of more than a week are common.
- Growthweight 20%58
Growth has flattened relative to peers in recent weeks.
- Authenticityweight 20%70
Most signals look organic; a few patterns warrant a second look.
How the audience interacts
Engagement rate is the headline, but the texture matters more. The like-to-comment ratio reveals whether the audience is reacting or engaging.
The like-to-comment ratio reads 166.0 likes per comment. A lower ratio (more comments per like) usually points to a conversational audience; a much higher ratio can be a sign the audience is passive or that engagement was inflated.
When and how often they post
Consistency is the second-largest pillar of the score. Most accounts that flatten do so because cadence breaks before performance does.
Share this verdict, or save it
for the next time someone asks.
Watchlist requires a free account.