Benchmark ReportJun 28, 2026
Alix Earle
- Platform
- YouTube
- Niche
- food· medium confidence
- Subscribers
- 349K
- Posts analyzed
- 30
Overall · 0–100
41/100
Thin verdict
Compared against 0 macro food. Score weights the four pillars below.
- Engagementweight 35%28
Engagement sits below peers; reach is decent but interaction is thin.
- Consistencyweight 25%12
Cadence is uneven; gaps of more than a week are common.
- Growthweight 20%61
Growth is in line with peers — neither breakout nor stalled.
- Authenticityweight 20%80
Signals are consistent with an organically grown audience.
01Engagement
How the audience interacts
Engagement rate is the headline, but the texture matters more. The like-to-comment ratio reveals whether the audience is reacting or engaging.
Engagement rate
1.70%
Avg. likes per post
4,394
Avg. comments per post
130
33.8:1 like-to-comment
Avg. views per video
266,636
YouTube engagement is built on views, not likes. View-to- subscriber ratio is the headline reach signal here.
The like-to-comment ratio reads 33.8 likes per comment. A lower ratio (more comments per like) usually points to a conversational audience; a much higher ratio can be a sign the audience is passive or that engagement was inflated.
02
06 · Take it with you
Share this verdict, or save it
for the next time someone asks.
Watchlist requires a free account.